Texas Senator Nathan Johnson is standing by his push to change the state’s gambling laws, despite questions surrounding his ties to Las Vegas Sands Corporation. He insists his support for Senate Joint Resolution 82 is based on principle, not donations.
Good to know
- Texas Senator Nathan Johnson introduced a resolution to let voters decide on casino legalization.
- The Sands PAC gave Johnson $9,000 in campaign contributions.
- Legalization could lead to up to 10 resort casino licenses across Texas.
SJR 82 would allow Texans to vote on removing the constitutional ban on gambling. That alone wouldn’t legalize casinos right away, but it would clear the way for future legislation. Johnson believes Texans should decide the matter at the ballot box. He’s also argued that legal gambling could provide the state with an economic boost, especially if federal funds become less reliable.
Some critics have pointed to the timing. Sands Corp had previously considered building a resort in Irving, part of Johnson’s district, though the company later dropped the casino element following local resistance. That plan came alongside increased lobbying efforts in Texas.
Questions About PAC Donations
Financial records show Johnson received $9,000 in campaign donations from the Texas Sands PAC. His office confirmed the contributions but stressed they weren’t tied to the legislation. Johnson noted he wasn’t alone in accepting money from Sands-linked groups—other lawmakers across party lines, including high-ranking officials, have also accepted donations.
“I did not work with Sands Corporation,” Johnson stated, adding that he has supported voter input on the gambling issue for years.
What Johnson’s Plan Could Lead To
If the resolution passes and voters approve it, lawmakers could eventually authorize up to ten resort-style casino licenses. These licenses would run for 40 years and cover full-service venues—casinos, hotels, live entertainment, dining, and more.
Johnson says any similarity to Sands’ earlier Irving proposal is just a coincidence. He emphasized that his support stems from long-standing policy goals, not pressure from lobbyists.
Supporters of the bill argue that a regulated casino industry could reduce illegal gambling, keep money from flowing out of state, and add new revenue streams. But opposition remains strong, especially among conservative lawmakers and local groups.
Calls for Honest Debate
Johnson believes Texas needs to confront the issue directly. He has urged lawmakers to stop avoiding the topic and start discussing what legalized gambling could mean for state finances and public policy.
“It’s time we face the facts,” he said, pointing out that underground gambling already exists in Texas but brings no tax revenue and little oversight.
The post Johnson Says Sands PAC Donations Did Not Affect Casino Plan appeared first on iGaming.org.