Aristocrat Leisure is a well-known international provider of gaming content and technology. A Kentucky resident filed a lawsuit against the company, arguing that their social casino games ought to be considered unlawful gambling. This lawsuit brings to light the ongoing legal controversy surrounding social casino games, which let users use virtual money to partake in casino-style activities.
The Nature of Social Casino Games
Social casino games have gained popularity as a form of entertainment distinct from traditional gambling. These games enable players to participate in casino-style activities, such as slot machines, using virtual currency. Although players can purchase this virtual currency with real money, it cannot be redeemed for real cash. Winnings from these games can be used for additional spins or other in-game benefits, but they do not translate into tangible financial gains.
Despite their classification as a niche entertainment genre, some jurisdictions with stringent gambling laws treat social casino games similarly to gambling products. This legal ambiguity has led to disputes, such as the one involving Kentucky resident James Scott Tipmore.
Earlier this month, Tipmore filed a lawsuit with the Kentucky Western District Court, naming Aristocrat Leisure as the defendant. The lawsuit asserts that the company’s social casino games violate Kentucky’s gambling laws. Tipmore’s legal team argues that the state’s definition of illegal gambling includes these games because they involve the possibility of winning “something of value.”
Tipmore’s complaint also alleges that Aristocrat Leisure and similar companies have exploited modern technology to expand the reach of their social casino games. He contends that these companies have effectively “smuggled illegal slot machines into the homes and workplaces of Americans,” enabling gambling at any time without the need to visit a physical casino. Tipmore’s lawsuit emphasizes that the convenience and accessibility of these games, especially via smartphones, have made them dangerously addictive.
Tipmore also claims in his lawsuit that the phrase “social casino games” is deceptive. He says these games are really just slot machines covered up as light entertainment that you can play on your phone anywhere at any time. “These new slot machine applications, misleadingly referred to as ‘social casino games,’ are nothing more than slot machines that can be carried in one’s purse or pocket,” Tipmore writes in his lawsuit.
With possible ramifications for future regulations, this action clarifies the current legal disputes about the classification of social casino games.
The post Kentucky Resident Sues Aristocrat, Alleges Social Casino Games Are Illegal Gambling appeared first on iGaming.org.