In a case initiated by Tipping Point Gaming (TPG), Caesars Entertainment’s request for reconsideration was denied by the Nevada Supreme Court. A fresh trial is required by this ruling, bringing TPG’s fraud and other tort claims against Caesars back to life. In the protracted legal dispute, this reversal of former District Court Judge Nancy Allf’s decision represents a major turning point.
Background of the Dispute
TPG had developed innovative “picture in picture” technology, aiming to enhance casino floors with unique features. Collaborating with Caesars, TPG’s ambitions were halted when Caesars filed a lawsuit against the gaming technology developer. Sam Johnson, TPG founder and ex-Innovative Gaming Technology engineer, accused Caesars of obstructing a pending contract with a third party, potentially securing a substantial investment or an outright acquisition of TPG.
Court documents reveal that Caesars initially pressured potential TPG investor Accel Entertainment to withdraw their interest, which Accel complied with. Furthermore, when TPG couldn’t disclose a second suitor due to a nondisclosure agreement, Caesars allegedly took deliberate steps to sabotage any potential deals. This included filing a lawsuit that effectively deterred any future interest in TPG.
“Their lawsuit was a stunning blow. Several executives with Caesars had originally been discussing buying into our company, or even purchasing it entirely, and moving forward with the project,” Johnson said. “Caesars not only abruptly pulled the plug on our agreement, but internal Caesars emails show their executive team focused on delaying the development process instead of facilitating it as they had promised. Caesars executives knew that delay would prevent a major investment or outright purchase of TPG or would stop us from ever coming to market.”
Due to the consequences of these acts, TPG was forced to close, which resulted in asset foreclosure and a total loss of value. According to court filings, TPG’s counterclaims against Caesars include damages for “bad faith, fraud, and tortious interference.” According to reports, the company is requesting punitive and consequential damages in the “nine-figure range.”
The Nevada Supreme Court’s decision highlights the seriousness of the accusations made against Caesars and gives TPG the opportunity to possibly obtain hefty recompense. Caesars’ actions and their effect on TPG’s financial future will be examined in detail in the next trial, which could significantly alter the corporate responsibility environment in the gaming sector.
The post Nevada Supreme Court Backs TPG’s Sam Johnson in Legal Clash with Caesars appeared first on iGaming.org.