As the current legislative session comes to a conclusion, a proposed gaming compact between the Seneca Nation and the state of New York has raised worries among local legislators, notably about the prospective creation of a casino near Rochester. While the state Senate has granted its consent to proceed, several politicians, like Democratic member Jeremy Cooney, want additional information and community participation before authorizing any agreement. The Seneca Nation’s recent announcement of a preliminary deal for a new 20-year casino gaming compact has fueled the dispute.
Local Lawmaker Seeks Community Input
Jeremy Cooney, a local Democratic member, is the state Senate’s single dissenter in the approval of the gaming compact discussion. Before making a decision, Cooney emphasizes the significance of addressing the people he represents and allowing for public input. While he confesses his personal views on gaming and gambling, Cooney feels that including the community and local government partners in decision-making is critical.
Assemblymember Harry Bronson, a Democrat representing the Rochester region, is skeptical of gaming as an economic driver. According to Bronson, creating a casino in downtown Rochester should be a non-starter. While recognizing the potential for job creation, he contends that alternate economic development programmes could benefit the city’s citizens more. Bronson emphasizes the importance of equitable agreements with tribal nations, particularly the Senecas, while also protecting Rochester’s people’ well-being.
The Seneca Nation’s Plans Are Uncertain
Despite the Seneca Nation’s recent announcement of a tentative deal for a new 20-year casino gaming compact, details about gambling in Rochester remain unknown. Concerns among local officials and residents have grown as a result of the lack of transparency surrounding this issue. According to reports in the Rochester Business Journal and Politico, the Seneca Nation is interested in developing a gambling facility in Rochester as part of the new accord.
Monroe County Legislator Rachel Barnhart has taken a stand against the prospective casino in Rochester and plans to draught a “memorialising resolution.” The resolution calls on Governor Kathy Hochul and the State Legislature to reject the inclusion of a casino in Monroe County in the new gaming compact. Casinos, according to Barnhart, do not provide meaningful economic growth, employment, or tourism. She also emphasizes the importance of conducting an impartial study to analyze the potential impacts of a casino on Rochester and Monroe County.
With the State Assembly scheduled to vote on the gaming compact measure later this month, the fight over the Seneca Nation’s proposed casino in Rochester is heating up. Legislators continue to fight for community engagement, equitable agreements, and comprehensive studies to assess the possible impact on local economy. The future of gaming in Rochester remains uncertain as the conversations continue, leaving citizens and stakeholders eagerly awaiting a conclusion.
The post Controversy Surrounds Proposed Gaming Compact and Potential Casino in Rochester appeared first on iGaming.org.