Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Gambling, & Poker News
Gambling, & Poker News
The Social Gaming Leadership Alliance is working to change how sweepstakes style games are viewed by players, regulators, and industry rivals. The group now promotes a new label called Social Plus, aiming to clear up confusion and rebuild trust across a fast-changing market.
Good to Know
Social gaming platforms supported by the SGLA helped popularize sweepstakes style contests over recent years, yet the environment has become more tense. Several state regulators expressed doubt about how these games operate, and some lawmakers pushed new restrictions or outright bans. The rebrand arrives at a moment when operators want cleaner language and a stronger narrative around consumer protection.
SGLA Managing Director Sean Ostrow framed Social Plus as a refreshed way to describe freemium social games that include sweepstakes style prize opportunities. The underlying model remains the same. Games use two virtual currencies, with players earning coins while also gaining entries that can turn into real-world prizes.
Ostrow said that competitors in the gambling space helped create confusion by spreading “misinformation” and “outright falsehoods.” He noted that partners inside the alliance require players to be at least 21 years old and follow strict guidelines around safety and responsible play. Ostrow wrote:
“‘Social Plus’ gives us a bite-sized term that can positively describe online social games with sweepstakes promotions in an understandable and easy-to-share way. Social games and entertainment are the core of what we do. But the ‘Plus’ is more than just the opportunity to win prizes, it is the higher standard of consumer protection and player safety that SGLA partners hold themselves to.”
Regulators across the country continue to question whether sweepstakes games resemble unlicensed online casinos. California advanced one of the toughest positions when Gov Gavin Newsom approved legislation that blocks social casino operations statewide. In Utah, a wave of lawsuits hit social casino operators at once, creating more instability around the category.
Minnesota also entered the conversation. The SGLA recently asked the state Attorney General to reconsider what the group described as a “mischaracterization” of Social Plus games. The alliance argued that the market has been harmed by “bad actors,” and requested that officials avoid punishing responsible operators.
Current alliance members include ARB Interactive, B-Two Operations, Nuvei, PlayStudios, VGW, and Yellow Social Interactive. The group says it is open to new partnerships, yet any company that wants in must meet strict requirements around consumer protection, data monitoring, financial controls, and safe operating practices.
SGLA leaders argue that Social Plus better communicates the experience enjoyed by most social players, especially as the group tries to distance the category from illegal operators that triggered enforcement actions in multiple states.
It is a new label used by SGLA partners to describe freemium social games that offer sweepstakes style prize opportunities through a dual currency format.
No. Core gameplay stays the same. The term Social Plus is meant to replace language that regulators often associate with online casinos.
Some states believe sweepstakes style games operate too closely to casino products. That concern led to lawsuits, enforcement actions, and new legislation.
No. California banned social casino style platforms statewide, and legal disputes are ongoing in Utah and other states.
The alliance welcomes new partners but requires high standards for responsible social gaming, safety rules, and financial protections.
The post Social Plus Becomes New Identity For Sweepstakes Style Gaming appeared first on iGaming.org.