{"id":6264,"date":"2023-12-12T05:53:26","date_gmt":"2023-12-12T05:53:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/slategray-wallaby-310340.hostingersite.com\/index.php\/2023\/12\/12\/draftkings-faces-potential-class-action-lawsuit-over-bonus-promotion-in-massachusetts\/"},"modified":"2023-12-12T05:53:26","modified_gmt":"2023-12-12T05:53:26","slug":"draftkings-faces-potential-class-action-lawsuit-over-bonus-promotion-in-massachusetts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/casino-online-best.com\/index.php\/2023\/12\/12\/draftkings-faces-potential-class-action-lawsuit-over-bonus-promotion-in-massachusetts\/","title":{"rendered":"DraftKings Faces Potential Class-Action Lawsuit Over Bonus Promotion in Massachusetts"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

The well-known sports betting behemoth DraftKings is in danger of facing a class-action lawsuit in its home state of Massachusetts. The Center for Public Health Litigation, located at Northeastern University, and the Public Health Advocacy Institute (PHAI) have declared their intention to take legal action in relation to an alleged deceptive marketing involving a $1,000 incentive given to new bettors in Massachusetts.<\/p>\n

The claim that DraftKings<\/a> consumers were not properly informed about the terms associated with the promised $1,000 bonus is at the center of the upcoming court action. According to the complaint, in order to be eligible for the bonus, players had to deposit $5,000 and put $25,000 worth of bets within a ninety-day period.<\/p>\n

In order for these wagers to be eligible for the offer, they also had to have odds of at least -300. According to the complaint, even if these requirements were satisfied, bettors would only get \u201cnon-withdrawable credits,\u201d not the real bonus that was promised.<\/p>\n

Executive Director of PHAI Mark Gottlieb emphasized the experiences of two plaintiffs who were identified in the case: Melissa Scanlon and Shane Harris. The lawsuit claims that a greater number of Massachusetts consumers were duped by vague bonus conditions.<\/p>\n

DraftKings\u2019 Response and Legal Defense<\/h2>\n

Disputing the claims made by PHAI, DraftKings expressed its intention to defend itself against the lawsuit. The company stated that it had attempted to engage in an in-person dialogue with PHAI to address concerns but was met with legal action instead.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n